The Return of Industrial Policy, and What It Quietly Walked Back In
Governments rediscovering the power of the state to direct investment have also, less visibly, rediscovered its power to pick winners.
The intellectual rehabilitation of industrial policy has been one of the more striking shifts in mainstream economic thinking over the past decade. Where state intervention in strategic sectors was once dismissed as inefficient at best and corrupt at worst, subsidy packages for semiconductors, clean energy, and critical minerals are now announced with bipartisan enthusiasm in capitals from Washington to Brussels to Seoul.
The shift is real, and in some respects overdue. But the speed of the rehabilitation has left important questions underexamined, questions that an older generation of development economists, burned by the failures of 1970s planning, might have pushed harder.
Who Decides What Is Strategic?
The category of 'strategic industry' has expanded with remarkable flexibility. Semiconductors clearly qualify. So, it turns out, does almost any manufacturing sector that employs enough people in enough marginal constituencies. The policy rationale and the electoral rationale are not always distinguishable from the outside, or, one suspects, from the inside.
The subsidy mechanisms themselves are frequently opaque. Direct grants, tax credits, accelerated depreciation, loan guarantees, regulatory carve-outs: the full value of a government support package is rarely disclosed in a single line. Journalists and researchers who try to calculate the actual public cost of a flagship investment deal often find the numbers scattered across multiple agencies and fiscal years.
The Leverage That Rarely Gets Mentioned
When a government offers substantial subsidy to attract a specific company to a specific location, it is, implicitly, accepting a significant shift in bargaining power. The company has been publicly courted. Walking away from the deal after announcement carries political costs that the initial commitment did not.
This is the leverage that rarely features in press releases celebrating inward investment. It tends to surface later: in renegotiated wage commitments, in environmental permit modifications, in the gradual softening of local content requirements. Industrial policy without robust conditionality and public audit is not a new idea so much as a very old one, the one that gave the concept a bad name the first time around.
More stories
The Hidden Balance Sheet of France's Urban Startup Bet
Beyond funding and mentorship, urban-transition programs offer founders something rarer: a real-world testing ground where public infrastructure meets private innovation.
The Subscription City: Can Recurring Revenue Fix Public Innovation?
As French municipalities struggle to fund digital and environmental upgrades, a new financing logic borrowed from software companies is quietly reshaping how innovation programs sustain themselves.
France's Quiet Bet on Territorial Incubators
As French cities scramble to reconcile digital ambition with ecological constraint, a new generation of place-based accelerators is emerging. The Ville de Demain program offers a useful case study in how public-private structures are trying to close the gap between innovation and implementation.